Skip to content
  • Home
  • Recent
Collapse
Brand Logo
CRYSTAL23
Latest v1.0.1
Tutorials Try the Demo Get a License
Tutorials Try the Demo Get a License Instagram
PeterRemotoundefined

PeterRemoto

@PeterRemoto
About
Posts
3
Topics
1
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • Error in RESTART of FREQCALC calculation
    PeterRemotoundefined PeterRemoto

    Sure, I've uploaded the files input files in this link because it exceeded the file size limit to upload them in this comment:
    https://otagouni-my.sharepoint.com/:f:/g/personal/rempe782_student_otago_ac_nz/EmtG3VsEJYJArghuK_IF1x0BvJNBiYsE1mrbQELFWOE1-A?e=NhXhQs

    Used the same inputs (.d12, fort.9, fort.13, fort.20, FREQINFO.DAT) for to do the frequency calculation restarts for CRYSTAL17 and 23

    Thanks heaps


  • Advice on frequency calculations on large solid systems -
    PeterRemotoundefined PeterRemoto

    Hey,
    I was wondering if anyone has any advice with dealing with crystal systems with transiton metal complexes with a floating anion? Our objective is to calculate the low-frequency Raman modes of these structures and compare with experimental.
    Using PBE functional with Grimme D3 dispersion correction and the pob-TZVP-rev2 basis set
    So managed to optimise the structure - which took a while but was fine
    908892_hicnis_PBE_D3_pob-TZVP-rev2_OPTGEOM_4_4.d12

    Now I'm doing frequency calculations
    908892_hicnis_PBE_D3_POB-TZVP-REV2_FREQ_4_4.d12
    But now a bit stuck with the frequency calculations because it doesn't seem to converge for the INTCPHF structures
    908892_hicnis_PBE_D3_POB-TZVP-REV2_FREQ_4_4-69914.out
    Tried GUESSP with fort.20 (copied from fort.9) to try to speed up the some bits before I hit my cluster time limit. However, the calculation doesn't seem to properly get past the INTCPHF cycles - Electric field applied to X direction hits 200 cycles, which is what the MAXYCLES set, which is already pretty high - so I can't use fort.32 (copied from fort.31) for INTCPHF RESTART. I'm currently running a calculation with MAXCYCLES increased to 9999 but it doesn't seem to help much looking at the ongoing ouput file.

    Not sure how else to troubleshoot this properly without using up all of our cluster allocation - so very open to advice and potential solutions to try out.

    Happy to provide more input files if need be.

    Thank you for your time,
    Peter


  • Error in RESTART of FREQCALC calculation
    PeterRemotoundefined PeterRemoto

    Hey, just to add onto this, I'm getting a similar error where the SCF won't wouldn't converge upon restart - but only occurs with certain structures.
    When I do with the restart with CRYSTAL17, it works perfectly - it's odd that it only happens on restart because when I lower the criteria, it doesn't need a restart and completes the calculation - but I can't keep lowering the tolerance criteria when I encounter this issue.

    CRYSTAL17 succesful restart:
    BLACTO_PBE_D3_AhTZVP_FREQ_4_4-53910034 - CRYSTAL17 success..out
    CRYSTAL23 unsucessful restart + SCFOUT:
    BLACTO_PBE_D3_AhTZVP_FREQ_4_4-53437836.out
    SCFOUT.LOG

    Any ideas around this?

    I've also included a plot of the DETOT from the SCFOUT.LOG files - where the successful one was from CRYSTAL17

    detot_vs_cycle_CRYSTAL17_SUCCESS_CYC0tomax.png

    The then rest from CRYSTAL23
    detot_vs_cycle_CRYSTAL23_FAIL_CYC0tomax.png detot_vs_cycle_CRYSTAL23_FAIL_CYC300tomax.png detot_vs_cycle_CRYSTAL23_FAIL_CYC1000tomax.PNG

    Our HPC platform provider said it was not an issue on their end and advised to seek support from the CRYSTAL team. Just to add on, our HPC platform provider also said I can't use the CRYSTAL17 anymore because they can't build the architecture on their new upgrade which, honestly, I don't really understand why.

    Happy to discuss,
    Peter

  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Home
  • Recent