Skip to content
  • Home
  • Recent
Collapse
Brand Logo
CRYSTAL23
Latest v1.0.1
Tutorials Try the Demo Get a License
Tutorials Try the Demo Get a License Instagram
  1. Home
  2. CRYSTAL
  3. Response Properties (CPHF/KS)
  4. BETAVIB (Vibrational contribution to the SHG and Electro Optic-Effect)
MSSC2026 Summer School: Registration is now open!

14-18 Sep 2026, London (UK)

Early Bird fee available until 8 May

BETAVIB (Vibrational contribution to the SHG and Electro Optic-Effect)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Response Properties (CPHF/KS)
3 Posts 2 Posters 107 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • rbnfritzundefined Offline
    rbnfritzundefined Offline
    rbnfritz
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Hi,

    I am trying to reproduce the results of an article that specifically focuses on LiNbO3. When using the 'BETAVIB' option, the manual states that the estimation is performed via "d", and the result is printed in the output as:

    " VIBRATIONAL POCKELS TENSOR, FREQ.=

    DIRECTION CHI(2)"
    And

    VIBRATIONAL SHG TENSOR, FREQ.=

    DIRECTION CHI(2)

    But in this article https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pssb.20230005, they (or maybe I misunderstood) said they compute beta using crystal17, and the same is true in this one: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927025623005232. Also, https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.045140 seems to follow the same rule.

    I want to clarify which term is printed in the output file "Using" BETAVIB, and in what unit it is printed?.

    Best.
    Rubén Fritz.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • aerbaundefined Offline
      aerbaundefined Offline
      aerba Developer
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Hi,

      Could you please share your CRYSTAL output file from the BETAVIB calculation? In case you also computed just the electronic term, could you share those output files as well?

      The first link you give looks broken: 404 page not found.
      Thanks,

      Alessandro Erba
      Professor of Physical Chemistry
      Department of Chemistry, University of Torino
      [email protected]

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • rbnfritzundefined Offline
        rbnfritzundefined Offline
        rbnfritz
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Hi,

        Thanks. Yes, Fisrt this is the first paper: https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.202300051.

        Here is the Electronic contribution to SHG and EO output file.
        Electronic.out

        This is the BETAVIB part.
        BETAVIB.out
        Best.

        Rubén Fritz.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0

        Powered by Crystal Solutions
        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Home
        • Recent