Skip to content
  • Home
  • Recent
Collapse
Brand Logo
CRYSTAL23
Latest v1.0.1
Tutorials Try the Demo Get a License
Tutorials Try the Demo Get a License Instagram
  1. Home
  2. CRYSTAL
  3. Elasticity, Piezoelectricity, Photoelasticity
  4. fort.62 issue

fort.62 issue

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Elasticity, Piezoelectricity, Photoelasticity
5 Posts 3 Posters 124 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • pcazadeundefined Offline
    pcazadeundefined Offline
    pcazade
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Hello,

    I'm running an elastic and piezolectric calculation that stops due to an error when reading the fort.62 file. Please find below the error message provided by Slurm (scheduler manager):

    forrtl: Invalid argument
    forrtl: severe (24): end-of-file during read, unit 62, file fort.62

    The error happens at the end of the first strain step or at the beginning of the second, though the output file was not updated.

    Is there a solution to this error? It happened twice in a row. Is it possible to restart a piezoelectric/elastic calculation?

    Kind regards,
    Pierre

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Aleksundefined Offline
      Aleksundefined Offline
      Aleks Expert
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Hi Pierre,
      Could you upload your input/output files for cross-checking? And and relevant fort files that contain some errors.
      Cheers,
      Aleks

      Aleksandar Živković, Scientific Assistant
      Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, LMU Munich, Germany
      Crystal enthusiast

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • pcazadeundefined Offline
        pcazadeundefined Offline
        pcazade
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Sure. Here they are.

        gggh-opt.d12
        gggh-opt.out

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • aerbaundefined Offline
          aerbaundefined Offline
          aerba Developer
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Hi,

          Just a couple of comments:

          1. Are you starting from a fully optimized structure? I ask because the following warning is printed in your output file:
          WARNING!! FORCE   9 AT CENTRAL POINT IS GREATER THAN 10^-4. OPTIMIZE THE STRUCTURE AND RE-RUN
          
          1. Anisotropic shrinking factors are not fully supported by ELAPIEZO calculations, which may be at the origin of the problem you are experiencing. I would advise to try running the calculation with an isotropic shrinking factor. Something like:
          SHRINK
          3 3
          

          Let us know if this helps,

          Alessandro Erba
          Professor of Physical Chemistry
          Department of Chemistry, University of Torino
          [email protected]

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • pcazadeundefined Offline
            pcazadeundefined Offline
            pcazade
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            Hi Alessandro,

            Thank you for your reply. I will use an isotropic shrink. I find it strange, though, to have the warning message as the structure was optimised. Anyway, I will rerun that.

            Kind regards,
            Pierre

            1 Reply Last reply
            0

            Powered by Crystal Solutions
            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Home
            • Recent