Skip to content
  • Home
  • Recent
Collapse
Brand Logo
CRYSTAL23
Latest v1.0.1
Tutorials Try the Demo Get a License
Tutorials Try the Demo Get a License Instagram
  1. Home
  2. Technical Aspects
  3. Bug Reports
  4. Frequency calculation fails with "Too much data, unit 2"

Frequency calculation fails with "Too much data, unit 2"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Bug Reports
2 Posts 2 Posters 49 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JohnKendrickundefined Offline
    JohnKendrickundefined Offline
    JohnKendrick
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Hi,

    I am doing a frequency with intensities calculation on an Iron complex with four Fe atoms in the unit cell. I am trying to do the ferromagnetic state with HSE06-D3 functional and the POB-tzvp-rev2 basis. I have optimised the cell, copied the optimised cell to fort.34 and copied the fort.9 file of the optimised calculation to fort.20, ready for a frequency calculation with intensities.

    The calculation is being run on 24 cores on a single node, with up to 4GBs of memory /core. The run uses intel mpi for interprocess communication.

    After reporting the hyperpolarisability and electric susceptibility tensors (Beta and Chi), the program crashes with:

    COMPUTING IR TENSOR ALONG DIRECTION X
    forrtl: severe (67): input statement requires too much data, unit 2, file /mnt/scratch/chmjke/SpinCrossover/CRYSTAL/HSE06/AFM2/fort.2.pe15
    

    I attach the input file: frequencies.d12
    A tar file of the output and fort.34: info.tgz

    Any help would be grateful received.
    Thanks John

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • aerbaundefined Offline
      aerbaundefined Offline
      aerba Developer
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Hi,

      Thank you for reporting this.

      While we run some tests on our cluster, may I suggest switching from a coupled-perturbed Kohn-Sham (CPKS) approach to a Berry phase (BP) approach for the IR intensities? The latter is way less computationally demanding than the former and in this case could be beneficial to the success of the calculation.

      You are currently using CPKS as per your input file:

      FREQCALC
      NOECKART
      INTENS
      INTCPHF
      FMIXING
      60
      ANDERSON
      MAXCYCLE
      300
      ENDCPHF
      ENDFREQ
      

      To switch to BP, you can use instead:

      FREQCALC
      NOECKART
      INTENS
      ENDFREQ
      

      Let me know how this goes,

      Alessandro Erba
      Professor of Physical Chemistry
      Department of Chemistry, University of Torino
      [email protected]

      1 Reply Last reply
      0

      Powered by Crystal Solutions
      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Home
      • Recent