Skip to content
  • Home
  • Recent
Collapse
Brand Logo
CRYSTAL23
Latest v1.0.1
Tutorials Try the Demo Get a License
Tutorials Try the Demo Get a License Instagram
  1. Home
  2. CRYSTAL
  3. Vibrational Spectroscopies: IR, Raman, INS
  4. Imaginary frequencies

Imaginary frequencies

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Vibrational Spectroscopies: IR, Raman, INS
2 Posts 2 Posters 831 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mones19
    mones19
    mones19
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I am getting multiple imaginary frequencies due to methyl rotational modes.
    I tried different functional/basis set and tightening the geometry optimization convergence but still imaginary frequencies persistently appear. What other options might solve the imaginary frequency issue?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • aerba
      aerba
      aerba
      Developer
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Hi,

      The presence of imaginary frequencies is a sign that the geometry is not a minimum of the potential energy surface (PES). In general, this may due to two main factors:

      1) A somewhat loose overall numerical precision in the geometry optimization + harmonic frequencies calculation. Here, it seems that you have already explored a few parameters. We can distinguish between parameters governing the overall numerical precision of the SCF + forces calculations, and those that are specific to the evaluation of the Hessian:

      1.1) Precision of SCF+forces

      One may increase a bit the thresholds for the screening of two-electron integrals (TOLINTEG keyword), switch-off the bipolar approximation (NOBIPOLA keyword), increase the shrinking factor (SHRINK keyword), use a denser grid for numerical integration of the exchange-correlation term (see XLGRID, XXLGRID keywords), tighten the convergence criteria for the SCF (setting TOLDEE to 10 or 11 for instance), tighten the convergence criteria for the geometry optimization step (see TOLDEG and TOLDEX keywords).

      1.2) Numerical evaluation of the Hessian

      In many cases, a more numerically stable evaluation of the Hessian is achieved by use of a two-sided finite difference approach (rather than the default one-sided approach). This can be activated with the NUMDERIV keyword within the FREQCALC input block as follows:

      FREQCALC
      NUMDERIV
      2
      ENDFREQ
      

      2) The presence of symmetry-constraints that prevent the optimizer to get to the minimum of the PES. If this is the case, removing symmetry constraints may be key to reach the minimum. This can be done by use of the SYMMREMO keyword (to be inserted in the geometry input block).

      Alessandro Erba
      Professor of Physical Chemistry
      Department of Chemistry, University of Torino
      [email protected]

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • Aleks Aleks referenced this topic on

      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

      Register Login
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      Powered by Crystal Solutions
      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Home
      • Recent