Skip to content
  • Home
  • Recent
Collapse
Brand Logo
CRYSTAL23
Latest v1.0.1
Tutorials Try the Demo Get a License
Tutorials Try the Demo Get a License Instagram
  1. Home
  2. CRYSTAL
  3. Vibrational Spectroscopies: IR, Raman, INS
  4. Error in RESTART of FREQCALC calculation

Error in RESTART of FREQCALC calculation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Vibrational Spectroscopies: IR, Raman, INS
13 Posts 3 Posters 155 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • job314undefined Offline
    job314undefined Offline
    job314
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    Alessandro, to prove the point how difficult these restarts are, I copied FREQINFO.DAT from the first frequency calculation, fort.13 unit, and fort.9, renamed fort.20 in the new scratch folder, grabbed the last optc file from the converged geometry optimization. Tried the restart with GUESSP since I am getting conducting state otherwise. Right away I have problems where my old and new vectors via GUESSP are different. why?

    INFORMATION FROM INTEGRAL EVALUATION

    RESTART FROM A PREVIOUS RUN FOCK MATRIX - DEP ACTIVE
    NUMBER OF COUPLE SETS (NEW, OLD, FOUND): 50745 15118 15039
    NUMBER OF IRREDUCIBLE G VECTORS : 71990 64543 63141

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • job314undefined Offline
      job314undefined Offline
      job314
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      Alessando, can I send you the files above so you can please try a restart? My restarts end up being conducting state and do not converge

      aerbaundefined 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • aerbaundefined Online
        aerbaundefined Online
        aerba Developer
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        Yes, please, send me all the files.

        Alessandro Erba
        Professor of Physical Chemistry
        Department of Chemistry, University of Torino
        [email protected]

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • aerbaundefined Online
          aerbaundefined Online
          aerba Developer
          replied to job314 last edited by
          #7

          job314 I am running some tests now. I reproduced your "possibly conducting state" problem. Let me try a couple of things.

          Alessandro Erba
          Professor of Physical Chemistry
          Department of Chemistry, University of Torino
          [email protected]

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • job314undefined Offline
            job314undefined Offline
            job314
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            Whew... At least you got it... It is uncanny how a normally job, aborted, can't be restarted since it can't converge SCF all of a sudden...

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • aerbaundefined Online
              aerbaundefined Online
              aerba Developer
              wrote last edited by aerba
              #9

              Hi,

              I have run some calculations on your case following my step-by step recipe (as described at https://forum.crystalsolutions.eu/post/339, which I have now edited to include the intensity step), and the restart now works just fine (i.e. without the annoying "possibly conducting state", and with a nice convergence of the further SCFs upon restart).

              This is what I did:

              • I took the optimized geometry from your original output file and I created a new input file for a single-point calculation. I ran it and obtained the wavefunction external file (i.e. fort.9 unit);

              • I prepared an input file to run the harmonic frequency calculation, I ran it and I killed it in the middle of the construction of the Hessian. From this incomplete frequency calculation, I obtained the FREQINFO.DAT file and the external unit with the density matrix, i.e. fort.13 unit;

              • I prepared an input file to restart the frequency calculation and provided the FREQINFO.DAT and fort.13 files from the previous step and the fort.9 (renamed as fort.20) from the first step, and ran it. The calculation of the Hessian restarted correctly, with the new SCFs converging nicely (see the attached SCFOUT.LOG file). I then stopped the calculation not to use too much compute power on my cluster.

              If you follow this step-by-step process you'll be able to safely restart your frequency calculations.

              Hope this helps,

              Alessandro Erba
              Professor of Physical Chemistry
              Department of Chemistry, University of Torino
              [email protected]

              job314undefined 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • PeterRemotoundefined Offline
                PeterRemotoundefined Offline
                PeterRemoto
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                Hey, just to add onto this, I'm getting a similar error where the SCF won't wouldn't converge upon restart - but only occurs with certain structures.
                When I do with the restart with CRYSTAL17, it works perfectly - it's odd that it only happens on restart because when I lower the criteria, it doesn't need a restart and completes the calculation - but I can't keep lowering the tolerance criteria when I encounter this issue.

                CRYSTAL17 succesful restart:
                BLACTO_PBE_D3_AhTZVP_FREQ_4_4-53910034 - CRYSTAL17 success..out
                CRYSTAL23 unsucessful restart + SCFOUT:
                BLACTO_PBE_D3_AhTZVP_FREQ_4_4-53437836.out
                SCFOUT.LOG

                Any ideas around this?

                I've also included a plot of the DETOT from the SCFOUT.LOG files - where the successful one was from CRYSTAL17

                detot_vs_cycle_CRYSTAL17_SUCCESS_CYC0tomax.png

                The then rest from CRYSTAL23
                detot_vs_cycle_CRYSTAL23_FAIL_CYC0tomax.png detot_vs_cycle_CRYSTAL23_FAIL_CYC300tomax.png detot_vs_cycle_CRYSTAL23_FAIL_CYC1000tomax.PNG

                Our HPC platform provider said it was not an issue on their end and advised to seek support from the CRYSTAL team. Just to add on, our HPC platform provider also said I can't use the CRYSTAL17 anymore because they can't build the architecture on their new upgrade which, honestly, I don't really understand why.

                Happy to discuss,
                Peter

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • aerbaundefined Online
                  aerbaundefined Online
                  aerba Developer
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  Hi,

                  By the looks of it, it may be due to some mismatch in the restart units. I am happy to run some tests. Could you share your input files for this case?

                  Alessandro Erba
                  Professor of Physical Chemistry
                  Department of Chemistry, University of Torino
                  [email protected]

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • PeterRemotoundefined Offline
                    PeterRemotoundefined Offline
                    PeterRemoto
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    Sure, I've uploaded the files input files in this link because it exceeded the file size limit to upload them in this comment:
                    https://otagouni-my.sharepoint.com/:f:/g/personal/rempe782_student_otago_ac_nz/EmtG3VsEJYJArghuK_IF1x0BvJNBiYsE1mrbQELFWOE1-A?e=NhXhQs

                    Used the same inputs (.d12, fort.9, fort.13, fort.20, FREQINFO.DAT) for to do the frequency calculation restarts for CRYSTAL17 and 23

                    Thanks heaps

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • job314undefined Offline
                      job314undefined Offline
                      job314
                      replied to aerba last edited by
                      #13

                      aerba said in Error in RESTART of FREQCALC calculation:

                      Hi,

                      I have run some calculations on your case following my step-by step recipe (as described at https://forum.crystalsolutions.eu/post/339, which I have now edited to include the intensity step), and the restart now works just fine (i.e. without the annoying "possibly conducting state", and with a nice convergence of the further SCFs upon restart).

                      This is what I did:

                      • I took the optimized geometry from your original output file and I created a new input file for a single-point calculation. I ran it and obtained the wavefunction external file (i.e. fort.9 unit);

                      • I prepared an input file to run the harmonic frequency calculation, I ran it and I killed it in the middle of the construction of the Hessian. From this incomplete frequency calculation, I obtained the FREQINFO.DAT file and the external unit with the density matrix, i.e. fort.13 unit;

                      • I prepared an input file to restart the frequency calculation and provided the FREQINFO.DAT and fort.13 files from the previous step and the fort.9 (renamed as fort.20) from the first step, and ran it. The calculation of the Hessian restarted correctly, with the new SCFs converging nicely (see the attached SCFOUT.LOG file). I then stopped the calculation not to use too much compute power on my cluster.

                      If you follow this step-by-step process you'll be able to safely restart your frequency calculations.

                      Hope this helps,

                      thank you and I am trying to do that

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      Powered by Crystal Solutions
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Home
                      • Recent